{"id":"W1985844814","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.012","title":"Equity control and the survival of international joint ventures: a contingency approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Singapore University of Social Sciences; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Equity (law); International joint venture; Contingency; Control (management); Business; Joint venture; Transaction cost; Economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Business administration; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105626,0.0003069089,0.0005094417,0.001749869,0.001412516,0.00539922,0.0009816852,0.002119306,0.006856121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01070182,0.0002439652,0.0004329702,0.001268014,0.004321127,0.004427745,0.00198685,0.002051288,0.0001410697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003344791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002074868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007272975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009986931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991277,0.0002498706,0.00003516149,0.0001072216,0.0001247097,0.0003553919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886291,0.005255942,0.003272357,0.0004896157,0.0009466525,0.001406419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000749366,0.0003264114,0.1314408,0.000106306,0.0002625118,0.001022905,0.001836683,0.03790007,0.0008989644,0.7883102,0.003912114,0.03323374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009569511,0.0004734584,0.1147071,0.0001101176,0.0002330403,0.0002864029,0.006344351,0.05066316,0.0008255018,0.8192056,0.006971463,0.00008410544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9029045,0.003539862,0.009822633,0.008879906,0.0001085931,0.00007358882,0.0002721926,0.00003865577,0.07436015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988784,0.0002115761,0.0001050432,0.00004132265,0.00003860554,0.00000492121,0.00001817703,0.000001956158,0.0006999642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007272975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02426827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08447723233275645,"score_gpt":0.3178125583801688,"score_spread":0.2333353260474124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}