{"id":"W1985891579","doi":"10.1007/s10270-013-0325-9","title":"VPML: an approach to detect design patterns of MOF-based modeling languages","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software & Systems Modeling","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; IBM (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Unified Modeling Language; Model transformation; Software design pattern; Eclipse; Modeling language; Programming language; Semantics (computer science); Model-driven architecture; Structural pattern; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Software development; Software design; Consistency (knowledge bases); Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003605982,0.0020634,0.001005633,0.005756905,0.001310425,0.003972079,0.003345561,0.00275781,0.004443179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01812107,0.001962061,0.002726157,0.002254829,0.001211504,0.005877345,0.003607065,0.003408806,0.001767588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001117067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00285078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006373356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007165988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995605,0.0009658263,0.0005005932,0.0006346009,0.00197423,0.0003197679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892679,0.005451345,0.001480825,0.001892443,0.001630572,0.00027682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008357763,0.001025502,0.03472317,0.002871594,0.0007323922,0.002167394,0.00597174,0.04883904,0.05240509,0.1182664,0.03784709,0.6943148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000192879,0.0002662758,0.004036218,0.000675438,0.0004656865,0.001513782,0.001316371,0.7156453,0.0784789,0.07821576,0.1189615,0.0002320389],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008104509,0.0000634914,0.9633688,0.0001519045,0.00003495994,0.0002527712,0.001083546,0.02600568,0.0009343622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0600239,0.0001184346,0.9321318,0.0001405416,0.00002175443,0.000392361,0.002894717,0.0030914,0.001185155],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006373356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01907045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05169012021342602,"score_gpt":0.2724063294857177,"score_spread":0.2207162092722917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}