{"id":"W1985926100","doi":"10.1080/00224490903151358","title":"The Sexual Consent Scale–Revised: Development, Reliability, and Preliminary Validity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sex Research","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Informed consent; Scale (ratio); Reliability (semiconductor); Construct validity; Social psychology; Test (biology); Validity; Internal consistency; Foundation (evidence); Sexual behavior; Theory of planned behavior; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Control (management); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01231352,0.000442528,0.0007760434,0.002020869,0.0007294491,0.0007610189,0.0009384159,0.0006039416,0.003129296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04092584,0.0004879375,0.001101703,0.001260441,0.0007046913,0.001283582,0.00154409,0.00173722,0.001125302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007843109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003003005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002785157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004628681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911394,0.002519092,0.001608286,0.0003933198,0.004118178,0.0002217705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773574,0.007976429,0.002941721,0.001168375,0.009831224,0.0007247127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000980654,0.001573145,0.5772117,0.001368154,0.0004916579,0.0003039617,0.007391717,0.001495614,0.003485955,0.003321704,0.02074144,0.3816342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003352868,0.001477043,0.9457471,0.0008473963,0.0002060935,0.001815723,0.002911429,0.003611107,0.002183547,0.002966144,0.03774803,0.0001511559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388224,0.003711778,0.01493439,0.001815061,0.0004038694,0.009284477,0.005704287,0.0002992741,0.02502439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947598,0.003647061,0.07303188,0.000760838,0.0001619232,0.01278978,0.008552741,0.0001385717,0.006157489],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01231352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2319175880367153,"score_gpt":0.4668784013400631,"score_spread":0.2349608133033478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}