{"id":"W1985939438","doi":"10.1007/s12136-002-1008-2","title":"The slingshot argument and the correspondence theory of truth","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Substitution (logic); Truth condition; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216058,0.00007512126,0.0001214251,0.00001986577,0.0001897843,0.0000296924,0.0004157674,0.00003559382,0.001675546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005672115,0.00003369214,0.0000586592,0.0001870014,0.001863083,0.00003324822,0.00006784956,0.0001306472,0.00009179395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006138256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004375719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004963439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.053977e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990023,0.0002641145,0.0001726175,0.0001732528,0.0001798088,0.0002078594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961327,0.003309505,0.00007262312,0.0003999992,0.00002444639,0.0000606992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001990319,0.00003177109,0.00003827168,9.887433e-7,0.00003303433,0.000002219482,0.001009609,1.69093e-7,0.0000403296,0.9940827,0.0003628469,0.004199021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006567796,0.00009498497,0.002288126,0.00001037735,0.0000706039,0.00001551477,0.0005608794,0.001538396,0.0001308166,0.9891976,0.005348688,0.00008723239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1271014,0.001163581,0.000229797,0.0161346,0.0004435979,0.0002159953,0.000006148912,0.00002191653,0.8546829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969286,0.00009209069,0.000008466692,0.0004406484,0.0000426619,0.000007442135,1.23629e-7,0.000003605946,0.002476369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02779545702844591,"score_gpt":0.273402059294556,"score_spread":0.2456066022661101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}