{"id":"W1985956533","doi":"10.4018/ijdsst.2014100102","title":"Quantitative Concession Behavior Analysis and Prediction for Decision Support in Electronic Negotiations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Crossover; Computer science; Decision support system; Generalization; Simple (philosophy); Operations research; Empirical research; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Management science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Law; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00663474,0.0006668036,0.0006040306,0.001893413,0.0005092827,0.00150376,0.001188604,0.0008057776,0.003264601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03854961,0.0003600962,0.0004945835,0.001676534,0.001395172,0.002700592,0.0007699002,0.001183923,0.0003188331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006310242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00279002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001378384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996087,0.002562526,0.0001825752,0.0003182369,0.0006804022,0.000169297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629794,0.03034018,0.002826476,0.002183103,0.001289916,0.0003808888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006289983,0.0007771871,0.04035639,0.0002213817,0.0001064361,0.0001449422,0.001232957,0.7775324,0.003797691,0.06806661,0.001054577,0.1060804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000862193,0.00006787037,0.002974196,0.000009449635,0.000004527788,0.00001889605,0.00009071152,0.9862669,0.0005722361,0.009816238,0.0001561695,0.00001422403],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4032623,0.0001643412,0.5890442,0.0002810909,0.00002043959,0.0003115208,0.0002245131,0.0007307768,0.005960881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519182,0.00003007525,0.04742769,0.00001678128,0.000006119121,0.0001454557,0.0001131849,0.00001575166,0.0003267379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00663474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0350883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01523898166026794,"score_gpt":0.3264846566704194,"score_spread":0.3112456750101514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}