{"id":"W1985956533","doi":"10.4018/ijdsst.2014100102","title":"Quantitative Concession Behavior Analysis and Prediction for Decision Support in Electronic Negotiations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Crossover; Computer science; Decision support system; Generalization; Simple (philosophy); Operations research; Empirical research; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Management science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Law; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002096452,0.0001795258,0.0005294512,0.003191649,0.0000981531,0.0001407084,0.001062931,0.0002462752,0.00002574356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008203475,0.0001514722,0.0001907468,0.001216399,0.00004523021,0.0007913407,0.0001705413,0.0002310373,0.00001280557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003713738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000183839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001579833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009866787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968255,0.000103652,0.001527255,0.0004097996,0.0008659209,0.0002679091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962474,0.0007786484,0.001199708,0.0003305847,0.001353438,0.00009024261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006965628,0.0006164653,0.326751,0.00004893979,0.0009994369,0.0001932254,0.001055658,0.001620581,0.009291803,0.2206314,0.002504984,0.4355899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01261662,0.006336961,0.2944203,0.001301803,0.0008951855,0.003896309,0.002152981,0.6276134,0.005870974,0.02042426,0.02341456,0.001056622],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2439957,0.00006965502,0.7539692,0.0003689074,0.001226607,0.0002659666,0.00001807542,0.00004870746,0.00003720235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431834,0.00005478177,0.05654284,0.0000367701,0.00007884925,0.00004779683,0.00001632427,0.0000107857,0.00002840509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6991878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6176855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01523898166026794,"score_gpt":0.3264846566704194,"score_spread":0.3112456750101514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}