{"id":"W1985975589","doi":"10.1139/t06-059","title":"Dynamic characteristics evaluation of Masjed Soleiman Dam using in situ dynamic tests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Dam Engineering and Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology","keywords":"Vibration; Structural engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Foundation (evidence); Modal; Embankment dam; Levee; Rigidity (electromagnetism); Modal analysis; Normal mode; Explosive material; Dynamic testing; Geology; Engineering; Finite element method; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006594568,0.0001503737,0.0002289027,0.0004299702,0.00004915174,0.00003297138,0.0001784811,0.0001672623,0.00002748616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007905861,0.0001701865,0.00006543175,0.0002726054,0.00003272646,0.00009386215,0.0000105407,0.0005139441,0.000005478674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001365515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002999687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001960477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02111194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986866,0.00003515174,0.0004755982,0.0001134465,0.0002820302,0.0004071328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994107,0.00002481399,0.00005948753,0.0001826488,0.0001006059,0.0002217386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002432889,0.00001406179,0.0003993456,0.00002553188,0.00001343055,0.00005979654,0.0000152396,0.9602447,0.02263361,0.00003760589,0.00006552715,0.01648875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002934096,0.00001219644,0.1447486,0.0001019952,0.00003135208,0.0001425377,0.000007396564,0.8537952,0.0000544525,0.0003657738,0.0002850644,0.0001620621],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802108,0.000283374,0.0184129,0.00007267282,0.0003555303,0.0001334714,0.00003516031,0.00006668555,0.0004294347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987513,0.00002332321,0.00108901,0.00001041285,0.00004934446,0.000002841413,0.00002620112,0.00003622478,0.00001136218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1443492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01075337496419328,"score_gpt":0.2355747010455624,"score_spread":0.2248213260813692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}