{"id":"W1986076164","doi":"10.1063/1.3696967","title":"The implementation of a self-consistent constricted variational density functional theory for the description of excited states","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Western Canada Research Grid","keywords":"Excited state; Density functional theory; Self consistent; Theoretical physics; Physics; Statistical physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics; Quantum electrodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007077621,0.0003397686,0.0005685607,0.000448159,0.0005669047,0.0006989084,0.002150751,0.001156649,0.0029049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001096369,0.000270756,0.0006955442,0.0005060669,0.0005029157,0.000567906,0.0006474881,0.001188422,0.001000711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003952299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00139728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001893184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00242367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996023,0.0001112633,0.00001438806,0.00002255092,0.0002213801,0.00002816784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996749,0.00009910621,0.00001214575,0.00009859978,0.00008923997,0.00002599975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006842152,0.0002162644,0.0009949184,0.0003148404,0.0001003663,0.0003625195,0.0001547654,0.5347347,0.020028,0.3590777,0.003970443,0.07997704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001196104,0.00004074325,0.000115488,0.00001590032,0.00000664229,0.00005554773,0.00001294481,0.9796418,0.002170037,0.01432635,0.003589793,0.0000128683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02331998,0.0002312532,0.9646019,0.0002493949,0.0001661209,0.0001622543,0.0002591316,0.0004301247,0.01057983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2901177,0.0004103413,0.7021981,0.0002010635,0.00006197562,0.0006001689,0.0004985295,0.0002686548,0.005643415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009717822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01850287111626839,"score_gpt":0.2610253287334971,"score_spread":0.2425224576172287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}