{"id":"W1986078808","doi":"10.1063/1.1809290","title":"Simple, cost effective, <i>in situ</i> sample hot stage for biological atomic force microscopy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Scientific Instruments","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Atomic force microscopy; Materials science; In situ; Nanotechnology; Sample (material); Microscope; Simplicity; Sample preparation; Microscopy; Resolution (logic); Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Process engineering; Optics; Chemistry; Chromatography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002844756,0.0006506903,0.0005709137,0.0004716786,0.0005474078,0.0006387143,0.001309338,0.0009877133,0.002616394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004389583,0.0005846006,0.0004428196,0.0002756602,0.0004167912,0.0009841603,0.0004521551,0.001231771,0.002938676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004421938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003378293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003515535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007191731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996562,0.000030243,0.00001888992,0.00005896267,0.0002107016,0.0000249172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997498,0.00005511583,0.00007046673,0.00004410578,0.00005473497,0.00002574445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001796522,0.00001582079,0.00007510477,0.0002142282,0.000003481879,0.00006576251,0.00001736643,0.00007582901,0.9874985,0.0005933177,0.0006835014,0.01073896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001016766,0.0002275696,0.0008854461,0.0000237412,0.00002078698,0.0009369757,0.00002638951,0.001748666,0.9585295,0.000322592,0.03724148,0.00002668674],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1391007,0.0276004,0.8068501,0.002277136,0.002339848,0.0009089123,0.0009517589,0.005119512,0.0148517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.244436,0.01378639,0.715899,0.0006563937,0.000432477,0.0007520469,0.0009791375,0.0004761232,0.02258253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002616394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008752763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01731141800791184,"score_gpt":0.3261022495368754,"score_spread":0.3087908315289635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}