{"id":"W1986180578","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2010.13","title":"Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Metabolism and Genetic Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; Genome Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Population; Reproductive medicine; Family medicine; Pregnancy; Environmental health; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00221546,0.0006090914,0.002233129,0.0001607332,0.0001224978,0.00006049329,0.00074212,0.0001711277,0.00003033917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001125406,0.0004879761,0.0006719182,0.0001481683,0.0001999727,0.00001284812,0.0002935178,0.000546544,0.000004728148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005209693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001275236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.217849e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003706011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949245,0.0007657393,0.002942249,0.0006587576,0.0004088612,0.0002999275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994295,0.00004680544,0.003519899,0.001126715,0.0008495513,0.0001620444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000180437,0.00004744675,0.000005107381,0.2517393,0.000593316,0.00002025957,0.0001536925,0.00003239058,0.000192676,0.00001172582,0.001600092,0.745586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003861888,0.0006136229,0.00001447397,0.3209082,0.001927128,0.0004778185,0.00008041844,0.000001124814,0.0003242131,0.00002571367,0.6748353,0.0004057167],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005065916,0.9943433,0.003180854,0.00004035042,0.0003015178,0.0009314238,0.00004935068,0.000006904863,0.0006397192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001170414,0.9339787,0.06413934,0.0001752985,0.001096188,0.000008263336,0.00007520162,0.0001327715,0.0003825125],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7451802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1118623329761141,"score_gpt":0.3441282488366765,"score_spread":0.2322659158605624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}