{"id":"W1986180578","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2010.13","title":"Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Metabolism and Genetic Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; Genome Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Population; Reproductive medicine; Family medicine; Pregnancy; Environmental health; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007503272,0.0009332587,0.004804241,0.004307661,0.0003069142,0.001232676,0.002138735,0.001679402,0.002256025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02217879,0.0005857454,0.002460754,0.004668606,0.0005839257,0.001492239,0.001052972,0.001548667,0.0002560206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001788274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007282445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008300355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966599,0.001045863,0.001266142,0.0002923817,0.0006408382,0.00009491057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837289,0.01213572,0.00243224,0.0001311362,0.001289018,0.0002828308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003357535,0.00003625861,0.001517568,0.4174324,0.004310308,0.0002033579,0.0002599754,0.0003898845,0.0003289281,0.0009319321,0.02247653,0.5517771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006647154,0.0002231426,0.009624512,0.7305434,0.03521465,0.001075286,0.0005583076,0.0003376249,0.0004410057,0.002179449,0.2190422,0.00009570573],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001809691,0.9987465,0.00010383,0.0006498263,0.00008939173,0.00001847816,0.00008354536,0.000002904637,0.0001245671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00265489,0.9955863,0.0007984572,0.0007239811,0.00007083103,0.00003377953,0.00008754876,0.000001871865,0.00004223512],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008300355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03968155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1118623329761141,"score_gpt":0.3441282488366765,"score_spread":0.2322659158605624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}