{"id":"W1986187480","doi":"10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00549-x","title":"Priority setting in health authorities: a novel approach to a historical activity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Health policy; Scarcity; Population health; Resource allocation; Health care; Service (business); Work (physics); Business; Health care rationing; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Process (computing); Public economics; Economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Environmental health; Marketing; Computer science; Management; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02187613,0.0007883293,0.001202742,0.005696654,0.004664483,0.01298725,0.002472148,0.008741517,0.005073727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03088757,0.0005899455,0.0008126186,0.004999129,0.03482237,0.01649842,0.004467912,0.009816303,0.0003061882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01589963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009392041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008181267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008714272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98853,0.008022739,0.0004700077,0.00120623,0.001140059,0.0006310564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803901,0.01424514,0.001010246,0.0009960297,0.002062946,0.001295551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003927062,0.000007057234,0.00007144043,0.00002187461,0.000003614193,0.00001681916,0.0004126416,0.0003983881,0.0000113879,0.9959385,0.001083927,0.002030439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001370806,0.00001388294,0.0001275354,0.00007276387,0.000007855036,0.00003423823,0.0004574844,0.001821103,0.00003951989,0.9792684,0.01813125,0.00001227083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02193591,0.02537218,0.4561934,0.3250056,0.007355506,0.0001791984,0.0002902495,0.0001295393,0.1635384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8658726,0.009278193,0.08463447,0.01551235,0.008942448,0.000289688,0.00007622926,0.0001141253,0.01527976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02187613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1156934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.373003983041553,"score_gpt":0.4648253973358399,"score_spread":0.09182141429428692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}