{"id":"W1986200023","doi":"10.1002/esp.1029","title":"Representing the landslide magnitude–frequency relation: Capilano River basin, British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Magnitude (astronomy); Landslide; Debris; Erosion; Sampling (signal processing); Geology; Drainage basin; Power law; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Physical geography; Geomorphology; Geography; Cartography; Statistics; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Oceanography; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002622095,0.0001197032,0.0001589674,0.000006527312,0.0006126346,0.0004240985,0.0001680742,0.0001037049,0.001433216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006732965,0.00009124613,0.00004315162,0.0002807663,0.0002041534,0.0004060107,0.0001298961,0.00022712,0.0001354908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002057309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003543834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02906641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04765371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988069,0.00001716229,0.0002187266,0.0003304859,0.0002966657,0.0003300571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995385,0.00004203825,0.00009510613,0.0001911697,0.00002944215,0.0001037688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001164054,0.0000374897,0.9927776,0.00005517669,0.00002240969,0.00004655818,0.0009430075,0.00192358,0.00005279994,0.00001496873,0.001020515,0.003094248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001331953,0.0001176107,0.9443238,0.0001576578,0.00004634765,0.0002887443,0.0002737774,0.00008670439,0.0001549916,0.004854685,0.04797828,0.0003854513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848282,0.001057331,0.0001765909,0.0005562294,0.00009123469,0.0002249179,0.00001342603,0.00006999619,0.01298204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899816,0.001106851,0.001494841,0.0002414872,0.0000566365,0.000006726059,0.00001805671,0.00001754975,0.007076237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04845381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005252098010571282,"score_gpt":0.1876750487353487,"score_spread":0.1824229507247774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}