{"id":"W1986201657","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.005","title":"Linking carbon sequestration science with local sustainability: An integrated assessment approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Sustainability; Livelihood; Sustainable development; Environmental planning; Business; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Land use; Greenhouse gas; China; Resource (disambiguation); Land management; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Agriculture; Economics; Political science; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006036,0.0002365614,0.0002007494,0.0002219585,0.000201011,0.0001397381,0.0005228131,0.00004261773,0.0002969746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000211073,0.0001828343,0.00005951868,0.0004476853,0.0009197604,0.0009323488,0.0002740634,0.000233983,0.00001618106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002242514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003572129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002662991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003086173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974862,0.00007807071,0.0004745767,0.0003711497,0.001166716,0.0004233358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991498,0.000009099373,0.0003477112,0.0003371553,0.00001181201,0.0001444508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004756829,0.004608934,0.3793679,0.0001740599,0.0001568366,0.0005426449,0.0006532617,0.4623256,0.004638309,0.01137495,0.0009464938,0.1347353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002313616,0.00189928,0.9100588,0.00006949486,0.0002896656,0.0001079345,0.003377613,0.05510833,0.0005622779,0.002916542,0.02246209,0.0008343271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234585,0.00001580671,0.0132852,0.0001501551,0.00008440185,0.00050205,0.000001750608,0.00002457607,0.06247757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846374,0.00001484436,0.013476,0.00008011968,0.000082693,0.00001200019,0.00001501685,0.00002069687,0.001661218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5306908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7455768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0046912047887176,"score_gpt":0.2250548357664332,"score_spread":0.2203636309777156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}