{"id":"W1986202748","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9388.2009.00621.x","title":"Testing Toxicity: Proof and Precaution in Canada's Chemicals Management Plan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Community & International Environmental Law","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Context (archaeology); Dilemma; Business; Plan (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Burden of proof; Environmental planning; Political science; Law; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06375278,0.001123128,0.001164492,0.004798463,0.0204825,0.0211611,0.008439823,0.03238876,0.003384343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07886091,0.001609704,0.001495137,0.003384644,0.03627036,0.009906797,0.009089611,0.01970203,0.0004520951],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1622499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5296969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9510311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9139922,0.01413222,0.003317068,0.004916582,0.0544146,0.009227445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9038802,0.04345109,0.004614468,0.002927481,0.03760073,0.007525973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003038506,0.00006536936,0.001442942,0.0003482347,0.00003001737,0.0005954052,0.003368182,0.001993993,0.0005310781,0.90757,0.06052741,0.02349694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001463356,0.0001869353,0.006040895,0.002118031,0.00007800668,0.0003324036,0.005256736,0.002702159,0.001013595,0.2101724,0.7715482,0.0004043066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01270804,0.01768584,0.01580449,0.7664387,0.001910886,0.0009238729,0.0003797297,0.0002032035,0.1839453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4068534,0.01956411,0.05829861,0.439091,0.001455721,0.001003101,0.0004310317,0.0001254896,0.07317771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01361803257625932,"score_gpt":0.2006595615262456,"score_spread":0.1870415289499863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}