{"id":"W1986235130","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2010.196","title":"EPIBLASTER-fast exhaustive two-locus epistasis detection strategy using graphical processing units","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistasis; Locus (genetics); Computation; SNP; Computer science; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Logistic regression; Computational biology; Multiple comparisons problem; Main effect; Statistics; Genetics; Mathematics; Data mining; Biology; Algorithm; Gene; Genotype","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101789,0.0002011197,0.0002385292,0.0001438828,0.0002669686,0.00005860199,0.0002913284,0.00009987455,0.00002242794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001338437,0.0001887217,0.0001172884,0.0001950487,0.0001822744,0.000007108735,0.00009590499,0.0004608733,0.000004878425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001552098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001183022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003937436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000640194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998239,0.0003867184,0.0006593583,0.0002401583,0.0001682081,0.0003065619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983067,0.00001431537,0.0006592211,0.000233011,0.0006141892,0.0001725542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004245585,0.00005813594,0.009152267,0.00001010497,0.00007334577,0.00003330199,0.0001045175,0.002356013,0.9562268,0.00001073717,0.0001059953,0.03182633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008006428,0.01199959,0.549955,0.0002178897,0.0008784941,0.003410645,0.002707616,0.005532963,0.3977562,0.001278598,0.0159387,0.002317816],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829576,0.0003985785,0.01528603,0.00002944922,0.0002974947,0.00007110147,0.000006390737,0.000006195914,0.0009471569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947342,0.00005765236,0.003940544,0.00006788586,0.001060231,5.427641e-7,0.00001041501,0.00004746304,0.00008111412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5584705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7695848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03242220871024015,"score_gpt":0.2952543580086956,"score_spread":0.2628321492984555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}