{"id":"W1986283049","doi":"10.1007/s00382-010-0834-y","title":"Diagnostic budget study of the internal variability in ensemble simulations of the Canadian RCM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate Dynamics","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Diabatic; Covariance; Climatology; Environmental science; Potential vorticity; Vorticity; Statistical physics; Meteorology; Atmospheric sciences; Physics; Mathematics; Statistics; Geology; Thermodynamics; Adiabatic process","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005021947,0.00006260202,0.000112376,0.00003801768,0.0001672497,0.00001312241,0.0003426647,0.00005316441,0.0003313018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001123887,0.00003455601,0.00003793971,0.0002453639,0.0001211667,0.00004071402,0.00003111512,0.0002237708,0.000003491143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001127553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000701048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1074328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991373,0.0001921811,0.0002613657,0.0001136105,0.0001297906,0.0001657476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982179,0.001252283,0.00009020609,0.000339595,0.00004448811,0.00005557416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002998007,0.00005136896,0.8731707,0.000003912755,0.000003059886,3.101351e-7,0.0002476128,0.1252274,0.000009836556,0.0008058536,9.587579e-7,0.0004760127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009676636,0.00002633828,0.6853817,0.000002847991,0.000007032264,2.763505e-7,0.00007549563,0.3105402,0.000001269164,0.003831403,0.000009743369,0.00002695592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931218,0.000002051476,0.00001402192,0.0001480702,0.0003810504,0.0003063089,0.0002938797,0.000003286409,0.005729549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998677,8.170977e-7,0.00003998532,0.00005029975,0.00000958715,8.136714e-7,0.00001790816,0.000001437482,0.00001142724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8670326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8985109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01166739246738381,"score_gpt":0.2284254033819504,"score_spread":0.2167580109145666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}