{"id":"W1986374267","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007","title":"Review of CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of greenhouse gas control","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":625,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates","funders":"","keywords":"Aquifer; Plume; Specific storage; Carbon sequestration; Permeability (electromagnetism); Petroleum engineering; Injection well; Environmental science; Volume (thermodynamics); Soil science; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Groundwater; Carbon dioxide; Chemistry; Geography; Meteorology; Groundwater recharge; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008559827,0.0007008777,0.001146464,0.002398571,0.0001642558,0.0009424318,0.000915145,0.0005814714,0.00136513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001290548,0.0002839104,0.0005102776,0.003994753,0.0003119159,0.001441783,0.0004157951,0.0006247688,0.0004865018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008678313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001354035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002830442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003553249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997442,0.00003436633,0.00005533403,0.00007095232,0.00007605325,0.00001909578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990385,0.0003654131,0.0001376072,0.00003266777,0.0003884042,0.00003759084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002631414,0.00006104042,0.0009554978,0.05285867,0.0004934072,0.0001718115,0.0001015029,0.001516873,0.01059609,0.005127869,0.03650084,0.8913533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002023053,0.0001786983,0.004959824,0.005844903,0.0006528829,0.000513678,0.0001409684,0.0004928889,0.00606268,0.002317664,0.9787593,0.00005633721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001019853,0.9970783,0.0002998854,0.0003173546,0.0003066168,0.000002875853,0.00006381542,0.000005513658,0.0009058612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006801215,0.9917932,0.0003092629,0.0001899468,0.0003096595,0.000003862919,0.00007881891,0.000004926116,0.0005090624],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002830442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006296575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01614468273498135,"score_gpt":0.2829326183764023,"score_spread":0.2667879356414209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}