{"id":"W1986404409","doi":"10.1002/rra.1389","title":"Development of a benthic macroinvertebrate flow sensitivity index for Canadian rivers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"River Research and Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; University of Victoria; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biota; Benthic zone; Environmental science; River ecosystem; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Biomonitoring; Index (typography); Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001493614,0.0006718663,0.0003463637,0.004906262,0.0008959775,0.0008893882,0.0009143453,0.0002816525,0.001010382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003600014,0.000203484,0.000435582,0.002807948,0.0002892924,0.0004106676,0.0006425357,0.0003964232,0.0001325132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007379875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007638389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8643293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9179458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.00007319544,0.00009263975,0.0001252874,0.0006011848,0.0001089385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977075,0.0001742382,0.0002272131,0.00006967485,0.001690599,0.0001308854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000198656,0.0001013385,0.7602894,0.0002693991,0.0002587093,0.0000813961,0.0002968126,0.02113302,0.02202306,0.001406443,0.005617443,0.1883243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110649,0.00007329892,0.9620539,0.00002874388,0.00005359049,0.00004875804,0.0001398208,0.02831392,0.004930753,0.0002240484,0.004068692,0.00005348092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9009345,0.0008261247,0.06738834,0.0002169785,0.00004052434,0.0008431523,0.0149522,0.0009232555,0.01387509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8967442,0.0003503969,0.09350105,0.0000647761,0.00001152918,0.0003030342,0.0067322,0.00004275791,0.002250086],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1356707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2729394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.026554428762152,"score_gpt":0.2877998108774562,"score_spread":0.2612453821153042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}