{"id":"W1986477468","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2006.05.005","title":"Elaboration of an electroporation protocol for Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Microbiological Methods","topic":"Microbial Inactivation Methods","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Université Laval; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Bacillus cereus; Elaboration; Electroporation; Microbiology; Chemistry; Biology; Bacillales; Bacillaceae; Bacteria; Bacillus subtilis; Biochemistry; Genetics; Gene; Humanities","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002591079,0.0001600767,0.0003316319,0.00008286657,0.00005716469,0.00002078903,0.0002227886,0.000310772,0.00003905886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007207337,0.0001180521,0.0001825733,0.000157537,0.00008841882,0.00001795521,0.00003317091,0.0001485367,4.394079e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004096747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001279242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000502354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004213316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997627,0.0010901,0.0008138919,0.0002161492,0.00006743265,0.0001854373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978229,0.00009813378,0.00101556,0.0001905435,0.0008230591,0.00004978307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001029799,0.0002094535,0.00005514203,0.00002404364,0.00002662444,5.52595e-7,0.000006388731,0.0001713096,0.985266,0.0002719577,0.001803603,0.01113509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001102974,0.003063138,0.0003134459,0.000009884081,0.00001700432,0.00005787982,0.00001608187,0.000033417,0.9001673,0.001670488,0.09342165,0.0001267144],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2377075,0.00004616232,0.7500178,0.0001026692,0.0001017276,0.01185555,0.00002353579,0.000006563236,0.0001384961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01842123,0.000005159777,0.9786858,0.0001067312,0.0005995386,0.001936099,0.0000946762,0.00001839086,0.0001323536],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.228668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4814024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03623175546381419,"score_gpt":0.4308690534871525,"score_spread":0.3946372980233384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}