{"id":"W1986483386","doi":"10.1115/1.1427338","title":"Crack-Tip Field of a Supersonic Bimaterial Interface Crack","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Mechanics","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supersonic speed; Isotropy; Homogeneous; Materials science; Field (mathematics); Stress field; Interface (matter); Mechanics; Composite material; Structural engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Engineering; Finite element method; Statistical physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000302334,0.0001761672,0.0004224419,0.0001178777,0.00001706963,0.00001996015,0.000298717,0.0001346108,0.0004097269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001007005,0.0001649178,0.0001213049,0.0002127954,0.000008894021,0.0001017047,0.00004447608,0.0004096559,0.00002033833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007557678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006320003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.752703e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.966816e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988106,0.00001350274,0.0005797283,0.00009308114,0.000252538,0.0002505134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993342,0.0001562831,0.0001466353,0.0001980268,0.00005861798,0.0001062634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009813315,0.00007515669,0.000001627547,0.0002751954,0.0001759312,0.00002215363,0.0008485019,0.06093389,0.896179,0.003919362,0.001693299,0.03577778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008533615,0.0003459126,0.000002663168,0.0001248761,0.00007723064,0.00009215365,0.0002475135,0.1812995,0.8060396,0.004764156,0.005835596,0.0003173985],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1003724,0.000486477,0.8936266,0.00005738579,0.002343885,0.000115328,0.000004287799,0.00009166189,0.00290207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703976,0.0002280257,0.1290164,0.00003168669,0.0002623965,0.000002647597,1.326488e-7,0.00004875462,0.00001232059],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7700253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6725155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01344058422079804,"score_gpt":0.2389433197066892,"score_spread":0.2255027354858912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}