{"id":"W1986552857","doi":"10.1177/0020715209105142","title":"Ecologically Unequal Exchange and the Resource Consumption/Environmental Degradation Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Environmental degradation; Per capita; Economics; Ecological footprint; Sustainable development; Developing country; Deforestation (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Ecology; Economic growth; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002021365,0.00009634833,0.0002683933,0.0007028077,0.0005054091,0.001487371,0.0003005977,0.0005039191,0.002887343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00647544,0.00008297645,0.0001543751,0.001201891,0.003298814,0.002709741,0.001534046,0.0007244971,0.0001112153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005914817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002865324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008269487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006582048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994181,0.0003073894,0.00002622664,0.00006685642,0.00008869353,0.00009276662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965525,0.002164033,0.0007505864,0.0002847938,0.0001042813,0.0001438115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000361196,0.000184025,0.09899612,0.0001262369,0.00009363891,0.0007893072,0.009004686,0.008451991,0.0009174134,0.8220603,0.002665639,0.0563494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003387382,0.0000374251,0.0856417,0.00004872071,0.00002465763,0.000381716,0.006195053,0.006239466,0.0003501888,0.8947849,0.006243305,0.00001888913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660714,0.0006638637,0.005422695,0.005036029,0.00001498376,0.000005171068,0.00004952803,0.00000699466,0.02272941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992031,0.0001376068,0.0002130751,0.0001341828,0.000007763406,0.000003060055,0.00001171516,0.00000134416,0.0002881663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002887343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01069015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05347818798487896,"score_gpt":0.2740438709711325,"score_spread":0.2205656829862536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}