{"id":"W1986552857","doi":"10.1177/0020715209105142","title":"Ecologically Unequal Exchange and the Resource Consumption/Environmental Degradation Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Environmental degradation; Per capita; Economics; Ecological footprint; Sustainable development; Developing country; Deforestation (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Ecology; Economic growth; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079905,0.0001190484,0.0003933207,0.0001177401,0.00007955464,0.00003240896,0.0003355766,0.00008893214,0.0004735688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005081542,0.00009744794,0.0001159963,0.00001642759,0.0006177732,0.0001779345,0.00005211982,0.0002341958,0.0001097428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001878356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000081708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002961246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000215093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987952,0.0001347631,0.0006993064,0.0001792227,0.00005592184,0.0001356187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985383,0.0003297066,0.0009722431,0.00009143169,0.00001712944,0.0000511785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004925836,0.0001976068,0.06361379,0.000001522223,0.0003703023,0.00001352948,0.00332185,0.001184125,0.0001280765,0.9277463,0.001783535,0.001146759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005880438,0.000480274,0.6190716,0.00000963576,0.00002136478,0.0001228216,0.0006548737,0.001816747,0.00009153302,0.3278646,0.0437326,0.0002535531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828598,0.002966031,0.002811706,0.006514363,0.0003416749,0.0000992159,0.00003484705,0.000005349037,0.004367046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965258,0.0009485924,0.0004616381,0.001597461,0.000221946,0.000004819456,0.00001650339,0.000004749816,0.0002185301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5998818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5185246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05347818798487896,"score_gpt":0.2740438709711325,"score_spread":0.2205656829862536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}