{"id":"W1986875759","doi":"10.1002/cncr.25052","title":"Economic evaluation of erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for anemia related to cancer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer","topic":"Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Anemia; Quality of life (healthcare); Cost–benefit analysis; Marginal cost; Quality-adjusted life year; Time horizon; Cost effectiveness; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Cancer; Economic evaluation; Erythropoiesis; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008950665,0.001299011,0.001610048,0.001410637,0.0004679838,0.002119313,0.001266206,0.001699556,0.004380483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03274374,0.0006306403,0.003278073,0.001701418,0.0007735666,0.001146546,0.0009382094,0.001942738,0.0001479609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01293961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009214257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03800817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02108177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920846,0.006820559,0.0001593526,0.000156475,0.0004564219,0.0003226709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835856,0.01425441,0.0007748837,0.0001477587,0.0007516893,0.0004856498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00612841,0.0005547322,0.00833002,0.005743346,0.004572055,0.0004062541,0.0001161109,0.8968852,0.0002885951,0.01649536,0.004704895,0.05577509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005353053,0.004386154,0.01048818,0.005051237,0.008358046,0.0006175642,0.0004938021,0.9161267,0.0008374653,0.03056526,0.0175684,0.0001541005],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6915339,0.1390088,0.05695706,0.01764765,0.000959861,0.007215495,0.01242564,0.0002223966,0.07402927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826774,0.009499851,0.004739219,0.0004599335,0.00004719345,0.0007119339,0.0008175224,0.00001529055,0.001031717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03800817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09388381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04662825247803726,"score_gpt":0.4054345455645209,"score_spread":0.3588062930864837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}