{"id":"W1986920782","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.005","title":"A multi-objective optimization procedure for bonded tubular-lap joints subjected to axial loading","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Adhesive; Materials science; Joint (building); Parametric statistics; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Rivet; Adhesive bonding; Lap joint; Stress (linguistics); Composite material; Layer (electronics); Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001449376,0.001467715,0.001475281,0.0008971692,0.000738209,0.000826086,0.001404464,0.00193709,0.004246052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00203019,0.0009711065,0.001206226,0.0006926007,0.0006529192,0.0006422615,0.0009455645,0.001102545,0.0004954895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006143621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007339143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008604668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997069,0.0001177251,0.00001611327,0.00004445667,0.00008189155,0.0000328983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.0003736894,0.00005144324,0.00002235702,0.0001480087,0.00002227767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003031875,0.00004108743,0.00009838426,0.0000697889,0.0000252082,0.00003705652,0.0000281973,0.9822959,0.001880515,0.001170216,0.0002222662,0.014101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005374648,0.00002320099,0.0000453658,0.00000443216,0.000005818501,0.000003923281,0.000007438067,0.9992139,0.0003563294,0.0001959256,0.0001348955,0.000003293629],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0203067,0.0001611803,0.9760131,0.00007121023,0.00003399115,0.0001272836,0.00005184989,0.0002303316,0.003004286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3439698,0.0002333038,0.6481346,0.00008161931,0.00004650484,0.00093403,0.0002022,0.0003129234,0.006084975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007339143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01459289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01484910673516663,"score_gpt":0.2458163807710942,"score_spread":0.2309672740359276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}