{"id":"W1986931751","doi":"10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00200.x","title":"Three‐Dimensional Topographic and Metrologic Evaluation of Dental Implants by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"Bone Tissue Engineering Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Surface roughness; Materials science; Dental implant; Biomedical engineering; Ablative case; Surface finish; Peri-implantitis; Implant; Dentistry; Acid etching; Titanium; Confocal; Medicine; Composite material; Surgery; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00436131,0.000147943,0.0003261032,0.0001369997,0.0001118282,0.00005099048,0.00009784358,0.0003682795,0.0001568646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003370818,0.0001316706,0.00004905219,0.0002135137,0.0003605948,0.00007637974,0.00006148596,0.0005995743,0.00002649775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001825566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003068412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001523836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007308944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979506,0.0003552712,0.000564712,0.0002878199,0.0004654567,0.0003761135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989433,0.0005566426,0.00004772996,0.0001635993,0.0001050464,0.0001836395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004165159,0.0005121394,0.05705586,0.0008934466,0.001878955,0.002836993,0.000138661,0.004018619,0.8785117,0.001131813,0.03671332,0.01589201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02254525,0.002286548,0.2588495,0.001519256,0.00118381,0.07856685,0.0004951685,0.1345955,0.4816552,0.0108977,0.004700092,0.002705185],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927359,0.004821353,0.00007807814,0.0000126082,0.001852823,0.0002376448,0.00008179905,0.00005347917,0.0001263325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993106,0.000325101,0.0001935071,0.000003709368,0.00002401551,0.00001172711,0.00004960583,0.00002067543,0.00006112128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3968565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5369372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08333368681697771,"score_gpt":0.4079834184781315,"score_spread":0.3246497316611537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}