{"id":"W1986958762","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.029","title":"Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Gynecologic Oncology","topic":"Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Cancer Centre; Arthritis Research Centre of Canada; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; NCMIC Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Asymptomatic; Relative risk; Meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer; Odds ratio; Confidence interval; Randomized controlled trial; Gynecology; MEDLINE; Obstetrics; Internal medicine; Cancer","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001333477,0.0006278622,0.01921248,0.0003945087,0.00008899486,0.00002262279,0.0001723697,0.0005487035,0.001182555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006452626,0.0003628035,0.001629269,0.0005688975,0.0001276976,0.0000460782,0.0001338779,0.0002299332,0.000007639233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005603601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004063041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001501248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008816143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962619,0.0005751305,0.001736789,0.0007642846,0.0001843216,0.0004775595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379,0.003099165,0.002000578,0.0006309214,0.0002125856,0.0002667524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003741088,0.0001573517,0.00002782411,0.6571058,0.2264675,0.000008399723,0.00004653331,0.000001027693,5.146072e-9,0.0001169256,0.0001728516,0.115892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007717673,0.001360086,0.0001416155,0.0202886,0.9348375,0.00007547119,0.00003322719,0.000008064681,8.497898e-8,0.00003952134,0.04217852,0.0002655098],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002024137,0.985991,0.00003472361,0.0009962836,0.00005238948,0.01233796,0.000394271,0.00002973794,0.0001433803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007552459,0.9591488,0.003406575,0.0009049755,0.0000316753,0.03594058,0.00008569443,0.00004046625,0.0003656617],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.70837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2217200633339239,"score_gpt":0.4224848015814642,"score_spread":0.2007647382475403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}