{"id":"W1986958762","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.029","title":"Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Gynecologic Oncology","topic":"Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Cancer Centre; Arthritis Research Centre of Canada; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; NCMIC Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Asymptomatic; Relative risk; Meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer; Odds ratio; Confidence interval; Randomized controlled trial; Gynecology; MEDLINE; Obstetrics; Internal medicine; Cancer","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005475594,0.002360671,0.01074676,0.002839955,0.0004828937,0.001762103,0.001719036,0.00231424,0.00407951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01873364,0.001770847,0.02810741,0.003484182,0.0006002546,0.001530943,0.001569538,0.002515892,0.0002705088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001623591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001774596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008451738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02371543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962992,0.001655644,0.0009757429,0.0004977055,0.0003930628,0.0001786348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906105,0.007264951,0.001269497,0.0002848137,0.000419473,0.000150734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004688937,0.0000528602,0.007166496,0.2739749,0.6974733,0.0002164533,0.0001106225,0.0005640413,0.0002718739,0.0001216135,0.0006344442,0.0147246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007309637,0.0001835187,0.003364327,0.008527363,0.9859588,0.00009073569,0.00004981997,0.0001081496,0.00005884531,0.0001378803,0.0007691234,0.00002047195],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008572644,0.990003,0.0004636549,0.0001348572,0.0001381438,0.0001071017,0.0003678741,0.00001737492,0.0001953349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2624457,0.7331009,0.001974883,0.0009572919,0.0002574754,0.0003325535,0.0004774872,0.00002078214,0.0004328544],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01074676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02895808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2217200633339239,"score_gpt":0.4224848015814642,"score_spread":0.2007647382475403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}