{"id":"W1987123712","doi":"10.1080/713649335","title":"The 'Haves' and the 'Have Nots': An Empirical Study of the Rational Actor and Party Capability Hypotheses in the High Court 1948–99","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Power (physics); Constitution; Politics; Law; Law and economics; High Court; Test (biology); Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004711002,0.00008532523,0.0001679698,0.00002080541,0.001881994,0.0001801003,0.0007159109,0.00003214948,0.00005458754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001461907,0.00003142317,0.00005001806,0.0003186904,0.01399006,0.0002801671,0.00005595253,0.0002710665,8.921489e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006919727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004476408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007410919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006243686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99721,0.0008058203,0.0003625336,0.0001452704,0.001056056,0.0004203744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979482,0.001443871,0.0001090567,0.0001439586,0.0001786118,0.0001763465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001221486,0.0003466739,0.3132706,0.000001379594,0.00001947782,0.000005281133,0.02246067,0.00001441428,0.00002708034,0.6622064,0.0002336903,0.001292182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003491291,0.0001376763,0.8920223,0.000009309823,0.00002304292,0.00001445361,0.03112126,0.000006625779,0.00001785127,0.07509404,0.001157772,0.00004651076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410704,0.00003684268,8.543798e-7,0.0571163,0.00009842221,0.000227258,0.00000593925,0.000001618835,0.001442302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.00002779353,0.00001002356,0.0004681555,0.0002031189,0.000004246961,3.34874e-8,0.000001248653,0.00006966396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5871123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06880131897825816,"score_gpt":0.3732283465553949,"score_spread":0.3044270275771367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}