{"id":"W1987123712","doi":"10.1080/713649335","title":"The 'Haves' and the 'Have Nots': An Empirical Study of the Rational Actor and Party Capability Hypotheses in the High Court 1948–99","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Power (physics); Constitution; Politics; Law; Law and economics; High Court; Test (biology); Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01093637,0.0001224301,0.0004481915,0.002261061,0.005318902,0.004699893,0.001301544,0.00158998,0.007561595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04189105,0.0002920484,0.000211912,0.00215603,0.01102669,0.005199054,0.003129916,0.003746269,0.0003352261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002969896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001443404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02236405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02902546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957552,0.002082522,0.0002267036,0.000383253,0.0007619098,0.0007903592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347441,0.04417139,0.01319065,0.001564799,0.002886644,0.003442481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004846947,0.001027593,0.4706976,0.0001188602,0.0001063744,0.001669671,0.3413782,0.0008552287,0.0008573682,0.1589912,0.002678665,0.02113459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004357835,0.0002719445,0.6067637,0.0001954145,0.00004224548,0.0003677869,0.3606674,0.001779625,0.0003689806,0.01607065,0.01336684,0.00006183073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883534,0.0001061793,0.0001302194,0.0008244211,0.00001029229,0.00001232742,0.00002221581,6.314298e-7,0.01054035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995034,0.00002630076,0.00001585028,0.00004001146,0.000006056835,0.000004175943,0.000009330287,7.881688e-7,0.0003941555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02236405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05783772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06880131897825816,"score_gpt":0.3732283465553949,"score_spread":0.3044270275771367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}