{"id":"W1987131434","doi":"10.3168/jds.2013-6783","title":"Technical note: A comparison of 2 methods of assessing lameness prevalence in tiestall herds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dairy Science","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation; Université Laval; University of Guelph; Valacta (Canada); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Dairy Farmers of Canada; Novalait; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Lameness; Hoof; Herd; Medicine; Limp; Veterinary medicine; Surgery; Anatomy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.124968,0.001089965,0.001244155,0.005108543,0.0009423363,0.002033002,0.00260535,0.001637603,0.002790184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1971074,0.001363001,0.002155622,0.002435683,0.001253036,0.001841759,0.003065713,0.001025582,0.001660071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00150912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004228033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007629535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.855158,0.09252279,0.01207985,0.009013934,0.02987101,0.001354567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7217484,0.1865566,0.01780191,0.02053034,0.05195899,0.001403734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009015612,0.0005803941,0.658268,0.003659013,0.002240258,0.0003403086,0.005128172,0.002377396,0.01753777,0.001207515,0.005929812,0.2937158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000952404,0.008321851,0.9255484,0.001663969,0.001652266,0.002024774,0.002103362,0.01861774,0.01838411,0.001116697,0.01912751,0.0004868298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6731309,0.0083031,0.2849002,0.002237042,0.00289674,0.008254685,0.004801368,0.001474521,0.01400144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5976055,0.001821048,0.3788071,0.001345572,0.0006887432,0.01174061,0.002458295,0.0007169805,0.004816093],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.660902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1254206186555973,"score_gpt":0.4854301404482395,"score_spread":0.3600095217926422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}