{"id":"W1987149948","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(99)00118-8","title":"The value of genetic information in the life insurance market","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Adverse selection; Economics; Incentive; Ex-ante; Life insurance; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Actuarial science; Private information retrieval; Selection (genetic algorithm); Value of information; Mathematical economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005678209,0.00006733073,0.0001499743,0.0001388902,0.0002300588,0.0002607167,0.0007692495,0.00004861849,0.0001195677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002599986,0.00004490267,0.0001189157,0.0002658073,0.000223833,0.0009931644,0.00001782943,0.000172286,0.000009369879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007025223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002513673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002807378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001027408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983145,0.0003929326,0.000788582,0.00005010518,0.0002344799,0.0002193767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987862,0.000217842,0.0006272338,0.0001888185,0.0001187869,0.00006107823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006019071,0.0001192199,0.6822585,0.00002166703,0.0001310632,0.000002149034,0.01082494,0.004116341,2.018103e-7,0.07526182,0.01058244,0.2166214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225509,0.00002344698,0.7100518,0.000005909937,0.000006861183,0.000002085091,0.002779395,0.000361374,3.02287e-7,0.003841361,0.2826554,0.00004652637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356277,0.0003403342,0.00003005031,0.005845611,0.000343901,0.0001665769,0.00000502588,0.000003253085,0.05763757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918636,0.007004422,0.0001605227,0.0006912933,0.0001838881,0.000004082249,3.548976e-7,0.000003430442,0.0000883734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.272073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2514097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01462435018214754,"score_gpt":0.2477671423955498,"score_spread":0.2331427922134023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}