{"id":"W1987174155","doi":"10.1115/ipc2002-27171","title":"Development of a FAD-Based Girth Weld ECA Procedure: Part I — Theoretical Framework","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Failure assessment; Girth (graph theory); Welding; Parametric statistics; Structural engineering; Stress intensity factor; Computer science; Finite element method; Fracture mechanics; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009283104,0.000153205,0.0001668131,0.00007453329,0.00003714916,0.0000373645,0.000145803,0.000103057,0.001953659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000853813,0.0001289689,0.00003619156,0.00006857119,0.00006459759,0.00005549607,0.00002477149,0.000176969,0.00003166289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001430671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002968573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.137856e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005982333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991107,0.000009115043,0.0003199101,0.0001625957,0.000235398,0.0001622934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995868,0.00005637622,0.00004708653,0.000108089,0.0001224409,0.0000792289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007796486,0.0003905529,0.00165357,0.0003205915,0.0002059642,0.00002126231,0.002687069,0.001829525,0.00124032,0.8799624,0.0227302,0.08888057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005755118,0.00005133174,0.0003101384,0.0003674239,0.00002347498,0.000005696657,0.00008479136,0.7573777,0.01338335,0.008916339,0.2185392,0.0003649749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1833113,0.0007432426,0.7276397,0.003599658,0.002727432,0.0005740915,0.0001102095,0.0004117013,0.08088263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917808,0.00006274901,0.007437516,0.0002088339,0.0001532462,0.00002212641,0.0000297315,0.00001459057,0.0002904386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02447973001206564,"score_gpt":0.2325691908737183,"score_spread":0.2080894608616527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}