{"id":"W1987174155","doi":"10.1115/ipc2002-27171","title":"Development of a FAD-Based Girth Weld ECA Procedure: Part I — Theoretical Framework","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Failure assessment; Girth (graph theory); Welding; Parametric statistics; Structural engineering; Stress intensity factor; Computer science; Finite element method; Fracture mechanics; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968689,0.001372467,0.0007782943,0.003595994,0.0009148219,0.002297728,0.003342027,0.001330539,0.00870449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005086046,0.0007690452,0.001304687,0.001268926,0.001701575,0.002077252,0.00216156,0.001724017,0.004152235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001994887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004928456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003359395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981054,0.0004386916,0.0001659171,0.0003437746,0.0008587085,0.00008756787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997789,0.0005776979,0.000155495,0.0003197291,0.001099331,0.00005875025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000422188,0.0001266735,0.001942536,0.0006252207,0.00005005795,0.0004707872,0.000554885,0.1557485,0.01639673,0.5244064,0.005559068,0.294077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002283484,0.0002456443,0.001282901,0.0004064092,0.00003540212,0.0007996543,0.0002900934,0.7502782,0.01967781,0.1430688,0.08375894,0.0001332279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008455632,0.00007624384,0.9959248,0.00004944659,0.00001662208,0.0001994793,0.00008557059,0.0002848887,0.002517406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03427128,0.0003395979,0.9603114,0.00006145041,0.00004217263,0.0009066341,0.0003972154,0.0001869902,0.003483313],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00870449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02911937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02447973001206564,"score_gpt":0.2325691908737183,"score_spread":0.2080894608616527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}