{"id":"W1987210617","doi":"10.1007/s10552-010-9722-3","title":"Inequity in access to cancer care: a review of the Canadian literature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cancer Causes & Control","topic":"Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Cancer Centre; Cancer Care Nova Scotia; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"CINAHL; Socioeconomic status; Health equity; Medicine; Health care; MEDLINE; Cancer screening; Disadvantaged; Health services research; Public health; Gerontology; Environmental health; Cancer; Economic growth; Population; Nursing; Political science; Psychological intervention","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004952028,0.0009524753,0.002495218,0.0118742,0.001180526,0.002998309,0.001566458,0.001088775,0.004847339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01267676,0.0004906298,0.00156634,0.03357963,0.001840883,0.001479447,0.001325814,0.001298344,0.0002306672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02604221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09663159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8389882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9062014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978751,0.0002824796,0.0003109935,0.0002696344,0.00105521,0.0002066269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991392,0.003542483,0.001106557,0.0001043772,0.00337975,0.0004747253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001886025,0.00006702866,0.01132221,0.1126835,0.0009992649,0.0001842665,0.0008072003,0.000938915,0.000133479,0.007771666,0.05812002,0.806784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008439018,0.0001049565,0.121495,0.179702,0.005179225,0.0009007605,0.002905406,0.0005311953,0.0002896242,0.005879873,0.6827241,0.0002034037],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002858049,0.9976585,0.00003291064,0.001131491,0.00006455529,0.000006184752,0.0002559774,0.000001899005,0.0005626216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003238681,0.996227,0.00009224995,0.0002102987,0.00004949283,0.000005184002,0.00008614474,0.00000110402,0.00008978188],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1610118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09639516940036373,"score_gpt":0.3444597052329733,"score_spread":0.2480645358326096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}