{"id":"W1987271888","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.015","title":"Safety evaluation of right-turn smart channels using automated traffic conflict analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Traffic conflict; Channelized; Conflict analysis; Merge (version control); Intersection (aeronautics); Transport engineering; Pedestrian crossing; Computer science; SAFER; Poison control; Pedestrian; Simulation; Engineering; Computer security; Traffic congestion; Conflict resolution; Floating car data; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130869,0.0005455223,0.0006214094,0.00149786,0.0005668373,0.000771831,0.0006461513,0.0005965292,0.002897147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004027595,0.0002753731,0.0004237537,0.0006199075,0.000370373,0.0009250913,0.0005704552,0.0003189216,0.0003750781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000734026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009568639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00542363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005052078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984753,0.0005706449,0.00005287409,0.0002031211,0.000510155,0.0001879791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949777,0.002046533,0.0004180856,0.000369028,0.001903955,0.0002847356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02255244,0.003328741,0.3176016,0.00046556,0.0007053375,0.0006218918,0.001294795,0.2838771,0.1013967,0.002722498,0.00300883,0.2624245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002662793,0.003974376,0.08849642,0.00002227001,0.0003183905,0.000214599,0.0007430074,0.8723802,0.03158211,0.001102023,0.0008142305,0.00008607229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838304,0.00003932756,0.01381752,0.00002545259,0.00002466251,0.00006192501,0.0002074733,0.0002479983,0.001745276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964404,0.00001031753,0.00320338,0.000007177961,0.000004121768,0.00001568251,0.0001043199,0.00001054017,0.0002040483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00542363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01078415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04804739862698682,"score_gpt":0.2939189821214343,"score_spread":0.2458715834944475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}