{"id":"W1987300884","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778451","title":"Repeat Litigators and Agenda Setting on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Law; Inequality; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003520068,0.0001930458,0.0005967566,0.002027308,0.01664987,0.006752635,0.001348728,0.001913921,0.008691575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02241186,0.0002427919,0.0003662209,0.002245053,0.004229902,0.001157445,0.002750895,0.002297553,0.0003693269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09745833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1116982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936242,0.0006416775,0.00009196866,0.0004890001,0.001688389,0.003464834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986405,0.004109481,0.001505852,0.0003490838,0.003984239,0.003646397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006181346,0.0003645732,0.4471813,0.000153271,0.0002832467,0.002592723,0.0453234,0.009317555,0.002451426,0.3606086,0.05335995,0.07774585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002042402,0.000157605,0.793337,0.0003014039,0.0003199026,0.000304461,0.04867734,0.01003813,0.001675487,0.04392599,0.1007714,0.0002868915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021229,0.0007340623,0.0002915915,0.009359811,0.00003944286,0.00004738545,0.0003232388,0.000019218,0.08706233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957997,0.0001571793,0.00006418178,0.0003210944,0.00001143795,0.000005008552,0.00005832543,0.000005146811,0.003577822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09745833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.707113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03400445707971467,"score_gpt":0.260418403846956,"score_spread":0.2264139467672413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}