{"id":"W1987350481","doi":"10.1136/bmj.324.7337.569","title":"Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":383,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Quality (philosophy); Construct (python library); Reliability (semiconductor); Rating system; Health information; Information quality; Psychology; Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information system; Health care; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0569219,0.00038866,0.0007119563,0.006023949,0.002885243,0.004628141,0.001849025,0.001613598,0.001323604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1674248,0.0006376745,0.0009918342,0.004687919,0.004401084,0.006648339,0.004917314,0.002361784,0.0002884362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004056815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003794708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007862685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009582398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9747759,0.01203939,0.00508278,0.001229401,0.005681729,0.001190835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8043865,0.09626935,0.05755693,0.009303149,0.02818471,0.004299421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002467488,0.0003512017,0.7960787,0.001425219,0.0001294277,0.0006561998,0.1289188,0.0001001334,0.0006834434,0.001074844,0.002595908,0.06773945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002686026,0.000842164,0.7204831,0.002053477,0.00009901758,0.001401884,0.2631127,0.0006487012,0.000890859,0.0006175077,0.00969594,0.0001278353],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925812,0.001425087,0.001098959,0.002132253,0.0001311867,0.0001875683,0.00008737054,0.00002158349,0.002334686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961273,0.0007657639,0.001757469,0.0004378447,0.00005594522,0.0001919038,0.0001364468,0.0000148817,0.0005125137],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3010354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2812138753089871,"score_gpt":0.5309892793830421,"score_spread":0.249775404074055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}