{"id":"W1987420117","doi":"10.1038/sc.2009.119","title":"Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spinal Cord","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Institut de Readaptation Gingras Lindsay de Montreal","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Berg Balance Scale; Medicine; Concurrent validity; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Scale (ratio); Physical therapy; Paraplegia; Psychometrics; Spinal cord; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Internal consistency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002736303,0.0003686592,0.0005807874,0.001120362,0.0005497799,0.0009497712,0.0005569875,0.0006499729,0.000866842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009199603,0.0002976765,0.0005340689,0.000689765,0.0005013355,0.0007182926,0.001271392,0.0005526401,0.0002888021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003386466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006295338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005475763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009556876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998746,0.0003498972,0.0002409135,0.0001645602,0.0003624806,0.0001361218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962426,0.001135155,0.0007580722,0.000241325,0.001254154,0.0003687175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003253905,0.0001522553,0.9943945,0.00002023773,0.0001272374,0.00004769741,0.0006273379,0.00005355262,0.0009273209,0.00002597434,0.00005409347,0.003244366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002526934,0.000330247,0.9981763,0.000009811093,0.00003233525,0.0001014194,0.0006839264,0.0003160098,0.0001773004,0.00004032469,0.0001018729,0.000005148635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994084,0.0000530848,0.0000879506,0.00001280605,0.000007585038,0.00001918283,0.0000459143,0.000001749894,0.0003633094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.00003499895,0.0001287696,0.000017219,0.00000461409,0.00002324707,0.000127124,0.000001247648,0.0001114017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005475763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01447111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1630627883744833,"score_gpt":0.4563858951278086,"score_spread":0.2933231067533253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}