{"id":"W1987420117","doi":"10.1038/sc.2009.119","title":"Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spinal Cord","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Institut de Readaptation Gingras Lindsay de Montreal","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Berg Balance Scale; Medicine; Concurrent validity; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Scale (ratio); Physical therapy; Paraplegia; Psychometrics; Spinal cord; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Internal consistency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007255619,0.0001896319,0.0004541592,0.0001128964,0.00008824751,0.00002489141,0.0002179809,0.00006977699,0.00007054809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001600759,0.0001370949,0.00008962561,0.0005904677,0.00021706,0.0001003171,0.00008083587,0.000549558,0.000004424695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002321849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005239251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004215117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978236,0.0001616812,0.0004380022,0.0003644826,0.0006694294,0.0005428329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.00005514361,0.0001455086,0.0004145535,0.0001192339,0.0001795151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00263546,0.0003532557,0.9555297,0.0002002228,0.00002082821,0.00004958094,0.00004254848,0.000001754535,0.02316949,0.001814936,0.0003316808,0.01585056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001383673,0.008845619,0.9823859,0.0006392645,0.00004363533,0.00004065206,0.0002093573,0.000834884,0.004069427,0.0006031801,0.0008006052,0.0001437635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944297,0.0006867051,0.0001864952,0.001895299,0.000202523,0.0006031942,0.0000129706,0.00002327637,0.001959848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990062,0.0002159518,0.0003423673,0.0001871535,0.00008695179,0.00002434609,0.000003568184,0.00001141059,0.0001220363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02685625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5590568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1630627883744833,"score_gpt":0.4563858951278086,"score_spread":0.2933231067533253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}