{"id":"W1987433643","doi":"10.1139/x05-202","title":"Is ring width a reliable proxy for stem-biomass increment? A case study in European beech","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd","keywords":"Beech; Fagus sylvatica; Basal area; Biomass (ecology); Diameter at breast height; Environmental science; Growing season; Proxy (statistics); Main stem; Allometry; Atmospheric sciences; Physical geography; Biology; Agronomy; Ecology; Geology; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003213522,0.00008744249,0.0001276086,0.0004092815,0.0002600566,0.0001151884,0.0003410692,0.00003572837,0.0001155518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004242724,0.00007758491,0.00004518675,0.0004486573,0.00009217648,0.0002669488,0.00006094157,0.0003627247,0.00004434825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008342401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002379191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04345299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6215802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983975,0.000153574,0.0003581507,0.0001700596,0.0003814167,0.0005393423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999167,0.00005045863,0.00007565891,0.0001796688,0.00005727487,0.0004699315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745524,0.00006799067,0.9859404,0.000007653685,0.00001402733,0.004135625,0.00197503,0.003521324,0.00008013703,0.00002223515,0.0009548406,0.003263279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007907438,0.00363699,0.7625822,0.0004220011,0.00007086981,0.01127238,0.007707056,0.08988541,0.0004172257,0.001472941,0.1136804,0.0009451385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947731,0.00005401226,0.00004600766,0.0004333112,0.00003494299,0.0005248168,0.00001619113,0.000002377789,0.004115276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981098,0.000004511898,0.0006004211,0.00002937398,0.00005531002,0.00001184633,0.000001435742,0.00001697292,0.001170364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04841076443927798,"score_gpt":0.3020301066808628,"score_spread":0.2536193422415848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}