{"id":"W1987433643","doi":"10.1139/x05-202","title":"Is ring width a reliable proxy for stem-biomass increment? A case study in European beech","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd","keywords":"Beech; Fagus sylvatica; Basal area; Biomass (ecology); Diameter at breast height; Environmental science; Growing season; Proxy (statistics); Main stem; Allometry; Atmospheric sciences; Physical geography; Biology; Agronomy; Ecology; Geology; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002350402,0.0002887735,0.0002961587,0.0006891944,0.0002818784,0.000566102,0.0003674382,0.0005030207,0.000334555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005561498,0.0001535328,0.0001853795,0.0009516726,0.0004433454,0.0004355425,0.0002501195,0.0002252511,0.00008546378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005038636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001701094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02872179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05968881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991975,0.0004768927,0.00005671503,0.000134404,0.00006648609,0.00006799446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951563,0.003418079,0.0005187009,0.0003917229,0.0003972361,0.0001180649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001355717,0.00002453409,0.9870913,0.00001582848,0.00003915414,0.0008785531,0.0002360682,0.0005701592,0.001180767,0.00009008023,0.00005651266,0.009681514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004821984,0.00008778303,0.9952816,0.000007756328,0.00003469674,0.00101428,0.0003159853,0.002325774,0.0004902332,0.00009862195,0.0003307666,0.000007684491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987618,0.0005601994,0.000358403,0.00003205825,0.000001657119,0.000002839788,0.00005780631,0.000003107697,0.0002222147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994024,0.0001106346,0.0003537266,0.00000741881,0.000003792523,0.000001556624,0.0000489556,0.000001681242,0.0000698614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02872179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05710918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04841076443927798,"score_gpt":0.3020301066808628,"score_spread":0.2536193422415848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}