{"id":"W1987527794","doi":"10.5539/mas.v3n3p96","title":"The Regional Resource Supply and Environmental Capacity Analysis Based on the Ecological Footprint--a case study in Shijiazhuang of Hebei Province","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Resource (disambiguation); Ecological deficit; Sustainable development; Natural resource; Carrying capacity; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Exploitation of natural resources; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003422869,0.0001582631,0.0002501035,0.0000852028,0.0008978402,0.00008268122,0.0006210573,0.00005734109,0.00009129618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001214633,0.00008484513,0.00008417261,0.001097453,0.001872513,0.00006135016,0.0002346646,0.0002246748,0.000004080532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004298123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002407546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007444099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003687144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975999,0.0002085627,0.0003473785,0.0006813434,0.0007441326,0.0004186821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986076,0.0005618929,0.0001358749,0.0005765453,0.000005037538,0.000113063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001625906,0.002137245,0.8475018,0.000003734758,0.00003577493,0.0001655406,0.003202278,0.117912,0.009576529,0.0009208823,0.00001954841,0.01836208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002164871,0.000250449,0.7753345,0.000001234556,0.00004451526,0.000009834044,0.007434917,0.2152587,0.0001197849,0.001135966,0.00006218029,0.000131347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965689,0.000006132128,0.0006254393,0.0009238197,0.000004538386,0.0007363354,0.000002252312,0.00001125123,0.00112137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994985,0.000001064348,0.00008724967,0.0003166222,0.000005155127,0.00005707302,5.760156e-7,0.000002527785,0.00003126101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09734674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6905552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01660640308202183,"score_gpt":0.2156496496082375,"score_spread":0.1990432465262157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}