{"id":"W1987527794","doi":"10.5539/mas.v3n3p96","title":"The Regional Resource Supply and Environmental Capacity Analysis Based on the Ecological Footprint--a case study in Shijiazhuang of Hebei Province","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Resource (disambiguation); Ecological deficit; Sustainable development; Natural resource; Carrying capacity; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Exploitation of natural resources; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004974809,0.0002572568,0.000241424,0.001560203,0.0007436908,0.0007288067,0.0006130195,0.0003249829,0.001801773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006543439,0.0002306586,0.0004057498,0.002673585,0.0006218585,0.0006534001,0.0004119531,0.0002239273,0.00005031866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005104066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002393681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2840034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4117271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997428,0.00008545985,0.000009613967,0.00003023951,0.00005871693,0.00007313304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997293,0.0001224654,0.00003314234,0.00002099223,0.00005968596,0.00003438205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002501323,0.0002614543,0.4887637,0.0002851694,0.0003066081,0.007298113,0.003914766,0.3902524,0.005803519,0.03932584,0.002739084,0.06079917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006382538,0.000131781,0.4631583,0.00005267409,0.0002254423,0.000751538,0.01803058,0.5003128,0.00219936,0.006940294,0.008037691,0.00009577186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947224,0.00006928259,0.002043418,0.0001044124,0.000001598813,0.00001841864,0.0001716076,0.00001135661,0.002857553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984916,0.00004783382,0.0008156121,0.000002630481,8.786724e-7,0.000006723027,0.00007012706,0.000002076944,0.0005625722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2840034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5647006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01660640308202183,"score_gpt":0.2156496496082375,"score_spread":0.1990432465262157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}