{"id":"W1987591647","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.05.001","title":"Numerical simulation of shock diffraction on unstructured meshes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Fluids","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Martec (Canada); University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Unstructured grid; Mach number; Diffraction; Polygon mesh; Shock (circulatory); Shock wave; Benchmark (surveying); Computational fluid dynamics; Oblique shock; Computer science; Grid; Mathematics; Geometry; Mechanics; Physics; Optics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004536214,0.0004677167,0.0008593766,0.0005906536,0.0005537297,0.0008059384,0.0009920265,0.001354586,0.002187223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003159573,0.0004642759,0.0005141851,0.0006606738,0.0009181288,0.000628612,0.001263867,0.0008800807,0.0002179214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005698517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006458646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002833974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001489534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996197,0.00009816537,0.00001892038,0.00002457917,0.0001687353,0.00006980719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998628,0.0008697628,0.00008472925,0.000119026,0.0002108626,0.0000875743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796138,0.00006086145,0.0009702704,0.00006620627,0.00002875703,0.0002788632,0.0001711071,0.9731982,0.007752653,0.00945443,0.0006289371,0.007210087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001906892,0.00001490268,0.000152658,0.000003494783,0.000001987124,0.00002490127,0.00001697423,0.9973677,0.001253355,0.0009388358,0.0002014688,0.000004734013],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6078261,0.0004734981,0.3596742,0.0005389352,0.0002787817,0.0001485556,0.0002681423,0.0009888564,0.02980295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578727,0.00009962559,0.03902637,0.00005082281,0.00001953098,0.00004061074,0.0001389388,0.00009127671,0.002659957],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002833974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007317007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005996640495185139,"score_gpt":0.2205364541134464,"score_spread":0.2145398136182613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}