{"id":"W1987661385","doi":"10.1086/529587","title":"Economic Analysis of Reprocessing Single-Use Medical Devices: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","topic":"Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Capital District Health Authority; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; Institute of Health Economics; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reuse; Single use; Incentive; Medicine; Medical literature; Cost–benefit analysis; Quality (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Systematic review; MEDLINE; Computer science; Engineering; Process engineering; Waste management; Pathology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001726191,0.0005270315,0.007043351,0.000733076,0.0001514457,0.00001916753,0.0001671957,0.001537162,0.0003878249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108289,0.000368105,0.001290555,0.0007770874,0.0004151883,0.0002000711,0.00006910233,0.0006631855,0.00009192406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001009269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002132863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001720156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001301068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992772,0.003185924,0.002841469,0.0007658229,0.00006728139,0.0003674301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992306,0.004552396,0.002368737,0.0004633731,0.0001838972,0.0001255897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002815241,0.0002754431,0.002753949,0.6488275,0.01123734,0.00002195098,0.0000881729,0.000008145835,8.783901e-7,0.0009611764,0.002318049,0.3334793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007635946,0.000382018,0.0007399232,0.3473293,0.01704228,0.000972119,0.000004213141,0.0001531377,1.235214e-7,0.00002172676,0.6320552,0.0005363526],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004089283,0.9952517,0.001867974,0.0001998297,0.001220195,0.001096348,0.00009437093,0.00008971767,0.00013903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004355935,0.9966347,0.0000109651,0.001570365,0.00008907381,0.0001913848,0.0009298131,0.00002588992,0.0001121697],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6297371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03433088105515919,"score_gpt":0.3348797892061774,"score_spread":0.3005489081510183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}