{"id":"W1987710354","doi":"10.1111/1540-6237.8403013","title":"Acclimation Effects on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Cross‐Cultural Examination of Judicial Folklore<sup>*</sup>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Voting; Context (archaeology); Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Precedent; Politics; Generalizability theory; Judicial opinion; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Sociology; Psychology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00191861,0.0001058144,0.0001886415,0.00005447243,0.002511845,0.00007319118,0.00035227,0.0000615108,0.00004457048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009150124,0.00007805771,0.00007276158,0.0008979806,0.002880761,0.0003792169,0.00001003094,0.00009668939,0.000003246291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003430168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001527318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1430198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09442466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974609,0.0002937447,0.0002655615,0.0002035399,0.001390957,0.0003853194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998773,0.0003269551,0.0002034508,0.00008069463,0.0005503139,0.00006554399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001244962,0.0000443719,0.002476565,0.000007600401,0.00001372534,8.033614e-7,0.05189379,0.00000782786,0.001269733,0.9353227,0.0003386423,0.008611806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00103366,0.0008351037,0.7304528,0.0001309661,0.000074955,0.000001040736,0.1730176,0.0001436336,0.006544025,0.08308671,0.004072387,0.0006070643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912314,0.00002529813,0.00002015789,0.001193635,0.0003100966,0.0002788448,0.00001125613,0.00001337483,0.1069159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.000003240306,0.00001162809,0.0001318159,0.0002286234,0.00001859923,0.000001186984,0.000002764356,0.00005736877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.852236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0206836545176477,"score_gpt":0.2891717526265526,"score_spread":0.2684880981089049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}