{"id":"W1987788491","doi":"10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01086.x","title":"RISK AVERSION AND EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY: AN EXPERIMENT WITH LARGE AND SMALL STAKES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Econometrics; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Constant (computer programming); Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Mathematical economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01340195,0.0001080976,0.0002352279,0.00008963099,0.0002445965,0.0002566269,0.0003168577,0.00003936743,0.00007305281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008759261,0.00006235103,0.000074898,0.00005093498,0.00003841031,0.0007182006,0.000133184,0.0001827717,0.00003358194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002447712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003068424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006850671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002455097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974577,0.00140234,0.0005653803,0.0001699421,0.0002209006,0.0001837116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970815,0.0006185485,0.001791971,0.0002660736,0.0001040658,0.0001377935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001505881,0.0001198222,0.8878868,5.380538e-7,0.00004397595,0.000001309498,0.004146945,0.00004948893,0.00008343301,0.0001197192,0.001176718,0.1062207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009513014,0.0001580811,0.9809673,0.00001581605,0.00007031424,0.00002687716,0.005561532,0.0004411881,0.0001812332,0.003874752,0.007614843,0.000136709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971759,0.000145482,0.0003833143,0.000133412,0.0005517319,0.0000685077,0.00002089318,0.000006974485,0.001513817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989386,0.00003783709,0.0005075094,0.00005364059,0.0001933263,2.405467e-7,5.177184e-7,0.00001217822,0.0002562071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.106084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4644876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06218659874890897,"score_gpt":0.312326934608013,"score_spread":0.250140335859104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}