{"id":"W1987788491","doi":"10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01086.x","title":"RISK AVERSION AND EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY: AN EXPERIMENT WITH LARGE AND SMALL STAKES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Econometrics; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Constant (computer programming); Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Mathematical economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154637,0.0009239836,0.001322824,0.0005669227,0.0007308275,0.002260068,0.001882346,0.002361921,0.006524564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06518377,0.0005486254,0.0009419704,0.0007149486,0.002400634,0.002974161,0.00185098,0.004490008,0.0006611856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007258149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005658829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007456579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004681589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932666,0.00452703,0.0003268457,0.0007458369,0.0008894874,0.000244267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383578,0.1427197,0.005299306,0.01076662,0.001151139,0.00170542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05687799,0.1324398,0.08110488,0.002042828,0.002180773,0.002189168,0.01283024,0.198675,0.06955975,0.2895109,0.01617944,0.1364091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01481371,0.0394316,0.05566085,0.0002640751,0.0005550737,0.0006742898,0.002492417,0.5806064,0.02489754,0.2659488,0.01417726,0.0004781116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853693,0.00006790477,0.009599556,0.0006295182,0.00005646607,0.0002192359,0.0002628568,0.0000531621,0.003742119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858158,0.00007949796,0.01131169,0.0002987741,0.00003942294,0.0005904737,0.000292151,0.00002789537,0.001544311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08178091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06218659874890897,"score_gpt":0.312326934608013,"score_spread":0.250140335859104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}