{"id":"W1988017221","doi":"10.1007/s00049-008-0412-5","title":"Disturbance cues in freshwater prey fishes: do juvenile convict cichlids and rainbow trout respond to ammonium as an ‘early warning’ signal?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemoecology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Biology; Predation; Rainbow trout; Foraging; Trout; Ecology; Cichlid; Juvenile; Aposematism; Disturbance (geology); Predator; Zoology; Stocking; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002890673,0.000207984,0.0003370208,0.00008136615,0.0002744217,0.00001852215,0.0002820255,0.0001594815,0.002889755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001117265,0.0001957864,0.00003179953,0.0001689467,0.0005565897,0.0002605348,0.0004613834,0.0001641549,0.0005459787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001288721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001186934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002020675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01120395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998378,0.0001240579,0.0002626114,0.0006018679,0.0001212156,0.0005121872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999396,0.000151644,0.0000701272,0.0002509899,0.000008164238,0.0001230722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002260323,0.0001237266,0.9437639,0.000008891897,0.0000191661,0.0001295123,0.005888232,0.00005296291,0.0004725483,0.00002566643,0.04904236,0.0002469998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007132594,0.000599976,0.9440601,0.000005142377,0.00001193518,0.00001480985,0.0003237792,0.00004128865,0.001651211,0.0005253633,0.0518105,0.0002426446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852263,0.00003359814,0.00001157018,0.002139879,0.0001334054,0.0003991597,0.000005711107,0.00005291229,0.01199742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208,0.00004680426,0.0003966895,0.003227848,0.00003754287,0.0001637369,0.000009280993,0.00001732954,0.01402076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01100188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008832277492551272,"score_gpt":0.2219518265241636,"score_spread":0.2131195490316123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}