{"id":"W1988339481","doi":"10.1007/s40273-013-0096-8","title":"Systematic Literature Review of the Costs of Pregnancy in the US","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PharmacoEconomics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Systematic review; Medicine; Unintended pregnancy; Health economics; Pharmacoeconomics; Family medicine; Cost effectiveness; Public health; MEDLINE; Obstetrics; Environmental health; Intensive care medicine; Family planning; Population; Nursing; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009565735,0.0002292649,0.002044987,0.00007659748,0.00001877477,0.00000846338,0.0003491096,0.0001094856,0.00005034293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002270113,0.0001061489,0.0005004146,0.0002575764,0.00004515668,0.00006357809,0.00003434417,0.0004951583,0.0000280604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001695765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003077278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009554548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001174009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974585,0.0006093805,0.001412522,0.0002443278,0.0001195038,0.0001557183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974787,0.0001989653,0.001366095,0.0007853647,0.0001286508,0.00004222251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002817529,0.00004519998,0.000007057064,0.8223212,0.00007220059,0.000001298562,0.00005956458,9.184295e-8,9.553403e-7,0.00009423594,0.0008702194,0.1765251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001899609,0.00001992607,0.000009074139,0.8294556,0.001159844,0.00009672411,0.00000595435,0.000005514167,0.000003344117,0.000005745706,0.1689812,0.00006716489],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003277573,0.9894383,7.401527e-7,0.0003887686,0.0003560867,0.009025005,0.00003630517,0.000004054395,0.0007179776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002676613,0.9978406,0.00001276172,0.0009301972,0.0001916958,0.0007939607,0.00002990065,0.00002185387,0.0001522209],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1764579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4328627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04357798671956194,"score_gpt":0.3920959138012491,"score_spread":0.3485179270816872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}