{"id":"W198834749","doi":"10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_18","title":"Computational Inference for Evidential Reasoning in Support of Judicial Proof","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in fuzziness and soft computing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Argumentation theory; Computer science; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Evidential reasoning approach; Artificial intelligence; Argumentation framework; Deductive reasoning; Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Management science; Epistemology; Data science; Decision support system; Political science; Business decision mapping; Law; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074445,0.0006700545,0.00090405,0.001908381,0.001694026,0.005850596,0.003299315,0.002886776,0.007137252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02945972,0.0007415094,0.001990637,0.00193573,0.008153198,0.01158063,0.00315794,0.004989198,0.001513066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003045837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001743499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001641617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001641856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948224,0.002759395,0.0003537717,0.0004669016,0.001411068,0.0001864612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804213,0.01696653,0.0004756089,0.001282553,0.0007283401,0.0001257475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007527417,0.000007467714,0.00003600444,0.00004027533,0.000006925746,0.00003869611,0.0001645047,0.003774812,0.00007928092,0.9888376,0.0006879115,0.006319073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007429491,0.000003046354,0.00002423415,0.00002569193,0.000004997819,0.0000221232,0.00001897237,0.02057048,0.0001081003,0.9758533,0.003356646,0.000004978761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008380589,0.002543859,0.9210213,0.005655474,0.0002070494,0.00008985384,0.0001292397,0.000231286,0.06174128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3880275,0.002101051,0.5987224,0.0008443648,0.0006571531,0.0003776856,0.0003698704,0.0001238547,0.008776058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03937078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1437173194789029,"score_gpt":0.4202371468425699,"score_spread":0.276519827363667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}