{"id":"W1988359291","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.10.002","title":"Joint selection of balanced scorecard targets and weights in a collaborative setting","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Balanced scorecard; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Computer science; Joint (building); Measure (data warehouse); Performance measurement; Process management; Business; Management science; Economics; Data mining; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04720993,0.0008282129,0.002514364,0.004142225,0.001445227,0.006566687,0.002476492,0.002577466,0.003475868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1484653,0.0008488512,0.0008014907,0.004345973,0.001197076,0.004271314,0.004413089,0.001582872,0.001083139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001649509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003343414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001529986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001712029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9520407,0.03388804,0.002578549,0.003231944,0.005902054,0.002358649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.865055,0.09939198,0.007070472,0.009270972,0.01471398,0.00449758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006660229,0.003101746,0.05310629,0.0004048699,0.0008411522,0.0004347134,0.002838104,0.1329903,0.007249187,0.06571159,0.007709831,0.7189521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001304157,0.002491295,0.02897702,0.0001413704,0.0004955028,0.0002197843,0.001971362,0.8003923,0.008133936,0.1509266,0.004748605,0.000198057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5248919,0.0003902125,0.4573753,0.0008346812,0.0001322618,0.0007882934,0.000149683,0.0003866661,0.01505092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077681,0.00006255077,0.09017029,0.00005362746,0.00004184947,0.000327075,0.000207139,0.00004509077,0.001324264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04720993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2496729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007066419741098578,"score_gpt":0.2215842458989909,"score_spread":0.2145178261578923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}