{"id":"W1988456614","doi":"10.1348/026151008x401903","title":"Children's understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hyperbole; Sarcasm; Rhetorical question; Irony; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Rhetorical device; Literal and figurative language; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Metaphor; History; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003855197,0.00009153235,0.0002315212,0.0002476252,0.00005274495,0.00001530741,0.00009238879,0.0001043663,0.0001107296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003898399,0.0001089234,0.00004572487,0.0002135144,0.0001141311,0.0001602497,0.000009369829,0.0002409768,0.000006579676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008634033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003978573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003746196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003727486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988695,0.0001189924,0.0005016847,0.0001884542,0.0001404635,0.0001808819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999561,0.00002215242,0.0002543069,0.00005578411,0.00005102803,0.00005574513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001583137,0.002766704,0.1442578,0.00003577838,0.0006531469,0.001465345,0.02073097,0.00000489681,0.04008126,0.0063134,0.02520438,0.7569032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002343925,0.0002556382,0.9749082,0.0001083501,0.00002487771,0.009641638,0.005346869,2.13522e-7,0.0001995529,0.006942249,0.0001057144,0.0001227596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903786,0.00133892,0.0006998775,0.0003745101,0.0009775712,0.000129283,0.00000561497,0.000007732558,0.006087952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977618,0.0004411242,0.001141905,0.0004551158,0.0001186182,0.000001636637,0.000009499651,0.000007883835,0.00006235014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8306504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4441768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03164774598334397,"score_gpt":0.2953124170123475,"score_spread":0.2636646710290035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}