{"id":"W1988456614","doi":"10.1348/026151008x401903","title":"Children's understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hyperbole; Sarcasm; Rhetorical question; Irony; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Rhetorical device; Literal and figurative language; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Metaphor; History; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001270577,0.0003603655,0.0002991639,0.0007671699,0.0005229508,0.001284088,0.0002770593,0.0005123207,0.001546768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006718139,0.0003781349,0.0002286233,0.0002224743,0.0009448679,0.0007846498,0.0009134241,0.0006107471,0.0002158247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000568126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003463226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004204938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005906686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993165,0.0002516204,0.00004255369,0.0001124187,0.0001695552,0.0001074639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971291,0.001167054,0.001163995,0.0001229582,0.0002268917,0.0001900135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002631684,0.0002163665,0.4417294,0.0002065229,0.00004907905,0.0024111,0.4973432,0.0001980945,0.03032144,0.0005232051,0.0004076125,0.02633083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001334648,0.0003356086,0.8518143,0.0001127065,0.00005437373,0.003271545,0.1366252,0.0003342332,0.003833917,0.0004154753,0.003138551,0.00005076054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990746,0.0001104115,0.0001040599,0.00002701881,0.000001304206,0.0000028431,0.00001884313,0.000004494281,0.0006563059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987884,0.0002227086,0.0003589335,0.00001471852,0.000001766666,0.00001017763,0.00004857262,0.000004537293,0.0005500711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004204938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008360922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03164774598334397,"score_gpt":0.2953124170123475,"score_spread":0.2636646710290035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}