{"id":"W1988462032","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2008.03.003","title":"Considerations in video playback design: Using optic flow analysis to examine motion characteristics of live and computer-generated animation sequences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Processes","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Animation; Computer science; Motion (physics); Feature (linguistics); Computer vision; Computer animation; Video camera; Flow (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Video game; Computer graphics (images); Multimedia; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009255314,0.00009364262,0.0001902974,0.00008890164,0.00009808571,0.00001543989,0.00004432882,0.00005547446,0.0001581984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005982206,0.0000813345,0.00001649258,0.0004575632,0.0001611371,0.0001658262,0.00003949956,0.00003897597,0.000007968445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005189625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002650423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004496962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003896345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992588,0.00006058338,0.0002557806,0.0002092188,0.0001005667,0.0001150933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996834,0.0000524824,0.0001063351,0.00006671879,0.00004041447,0.00005066481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001314824,0.00009247179,0.9271128,0.00001696029,0.00002063255,0.00002640763,0.001338441,0.03124548,0.03919329,0.000003842002,0.00001628057,0.0009202366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001128817,0.0001214639,0.9290347,0.00001417112,0.00007666036,0.00005180458,0.0000539209,0.06372724,0.006683361,0.000009683768,5.440194e-7,0.0001136535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794416,0.00002780008,0.0202667,0.00003147118,0.00002252647,0.0001768932,0.00001489044,0.00001234303,0.000005809718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717326,0.00002089085,0.02814282,0.00003070927,0.00001279822,0.00000637846,0.00003226507,0.000004177872,0.00001734142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03250993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3316725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07544402868622496,"score_gpt":0.2642640863586864,"score_spread":0.1888200576724614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}