{"id":"W1988533009","doi":"10.1177/102425890601200204","title":"The <i>Vaxholm</i> case from a Swedish and European perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transfer European Review of Labour and Research","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Latvian; Directive; Context (archaeology); Common law; Law; Labour law; European court of justice; European Union law; Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Political science; Action plan; Business; Engineering; Management; Geography; Economics; International trade","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005655814,0.00010426,0.0001760023,0.00003879485,0.001163826,0.000131968,0.0002704815,0.00001011249,0.00007478701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003194044,0.00006632022,0.00006354838,0.0002273134,0.001327788,0.00008913675,0.00009937651,0.0002734708,0.0000469521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002277547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003418023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00473184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001246196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952314,0.003398902,0.0002924161,0.0002684865,0.0005256517,0.0002831783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986407,0.0005116916,0.00002478269,0.0001627156,0.0005644162,0.0000957018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002806677,0.00007604418,0.0005309481,0.0004997479,0.00006985494,0.001066393,0.00649143,7.597112e-8,0.0002175444,0.9686707,0.008147719,0.01420154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002940547,0.00007294201,0.01809118,0.001149595,0.00002378809,0.00004316117,0.004721307,5.38523e-7,0.00003109043,0.001400873,0.9740459,0.0001255652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1201719,0.1833913,0.00001028847,0.004723458,0.00005101724,0.0003017086,0.00006660182,0.00002252308,0.6912613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.714133,0.2798854,0.00002096704,0.0002429134,0.000296634,0.000002102101,0.000002082101,0.00001792157,0.005399001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8951324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0475813682261419,"score_gpt":0.3799039014279925,"score_spread":0.3323225332018506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}