{"id":"W1988576354","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0041","title":"Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Risk assessment; Clinical trial; Psychology; Common Rule; Scholarship; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1472938,0.0002380024,0.00145801,0.0001324318,0.0005251379,0.00003137735,0.001021084,0.002492117,0.0002340142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4662142,0.0001455223,0.001244458,0.0005579236,0.003710118,0.000148581,0.0003366269,0.05035893,0.0000298818],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001370728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01101615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001131175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001751857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868774,0.002297477,0.005230613,0.000445204,0.00461848,0.0005307792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9280983,0.05698202,0.003866954,0.002174614,0.007793902,0.001084273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07488485,0.00365348,0.004516106,0.02588146,0.002250403,0.0006829258,0.002679689,0.0006335837,0.0003323506,0.8457863,0.003663516,0.03503536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1609263,0.01228197,0.01029753,0.1577889,0.002472748,0.001541301,0.0004031726,0.00007830367,0.0008544457,0.5013348,0.1513233,0.0006972832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1681921,0.03596247,0.01924954,0.7252997,0.01403098,0.003696833,0.00007050457,0.00008108332,0.03341674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3341481,0.6301317,0.01713204,0.01519354,0.003104676,0.0000093458,0.00000856198,0.00004457515,0.0002275196],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6750610294722323,"score_gpt":0.6543314193011597,"score_spread":0.02072961017107267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}