{"id":"W1988576354","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0041","title":"Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Risk assessment; Clinical trial; Psychology; Common Rule; Scholarship; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6242211,0.001447577,0.004455699,0.007307809,0.01319083,0.04267754,0.007063156,0.04688331,0.002252242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7455035,0.001584742,0.002711208,0.006596733,0.1148721,0.0265661,0.01852703,0.04888506,0.001315182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0198159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08024482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004081955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004078444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2102457,0.6766381,0.0356034,0.009438029,0.06399542,0.004079266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09773774,0.8119642,0.01856318,0.02899585,0.03480072,0.007938288],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001139252,0.00004734151,0.0006851638,0.001128491,0.0001258556,0.0003770423,0.01412981,0.0007079397,0.0001824018,0.8159858,0.08388082,0.0826354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001046046,0.00009209736,0.0005611957,0.005552551,0.00007734163,0.0004621774,0.00464649,0.001017922,0.0002732977,0.7944403,0.1926404,0.0001317229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001418679,0.04147352,0.02986147,0.9007329,0.01008475,0.0001867912,0.00002381093,0.00004488714,0.01617329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.255264,0.06051943,0.115599,0.4998744,0.05479047,0.002606457,0.00008725956,0.0003408928,0.01091818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4634023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6750610294722323,"score_gpt":0.6543314193011597,"score_spread":0.02072961017107267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}