{"id":"W1988705714","doi":"10.1080/10826070802711071","title":"Quantitative <i>In Silico</i> Analysis of the Specificity of a Graphitic Carbon Column","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Carbon fibers; Hydrogen; Silica gel; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Matrix (chemical analysis); Chemical polarity; Aqueous solution; Hydrogen bond; Chromatography; Molecule; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Composite number; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003496999,0.000318391,0.001240385,0.001526548,0.00005954564,0.00001452562,0.001073376,0.0005711183,0.00004789374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002875862,0.0002349596,0.001830441,0.008512815,0.001153198,0.000110525,0.00008282249,0.0009377684,1.696301e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004286235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007143289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000258484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001228716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968768,0.00005297042,0.001783089,0.0002844729,0.0006389827,0.0003637097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967748,0.0002600685,0.001849873,0.000718427,0.0003362139,0.00006063793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005368429,0.001075744,0.1096914,0.0002388395,0.00460981,0.00008412915,0.0003698124,0.0004983018,0.8766935,0.005923136,0.00007043776,0.00020807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009787106,0.0008123701,0.01981605,0.0008436654,0.002571668,0.00006624319,0.004860296,0.0004787628,0.9611781,0.00799292,0.00004748911,0.0003537338],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919214,0.003441267,0.00001222825,0.0003687192,0.00003638219,0.00006990945,0.00002491058,0.0001058973,0.004019267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987131,0.0009306889,0.0003116392,0.00001071622,0.000006448152,0.000002217099,0.000002659119,0.00001339654,0.000009160402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08987532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008197071560374102,"score_gpt":0.234034990813478,"score_spread":0.2258379192531039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}