{"id":"W1988705714","doi":"10.1080/10826070802711071","title":"Quantitative <i>In Silico</i> Analysis of the Specificity of a Graphitic Carbon Column","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Carbon fibers; Hydrogen; Silica gel; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Matrix (chemical analysis); Chemical polarity; Aqueous solution; Hydrogen bond; Chromatography; Molecule; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Composite number; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001060092,0.0004159505,0.0003014107,0.0003315061,0.0002824191,0.0006724659,0.0004312287,0.000678119,0.001367595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001577349,0.0002390852,0.0003304623,0.000241099,0.000554044,0.0002451733,0.000167333,0.0004575634,0.0006199001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006484524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003807937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001852969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002202907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992344,0.000209153,0.00002940714,0.0001709173,0.0002629255,0.00009313123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990062,0.0006332672,0.0001050556,0.00006337605,0.0001561525,0.00003603246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001367923,0.00002486386,0.0008640868,0.00003628499,0.00001450498,0.00001366583,0.000008726131,0.001335294,0.9963043,0.0001130455,0.00004554649,0.001102996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004648631,0.0001072671,0.001964672,0.000001481687,0.00001416061,0.00002424205,0.000008132538,0.01425556,0.9832978,0.00005514627,0.0002606192,0.000006114853],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408301,0.000515476,0.05368423,0.0001725336,0.0000296017,0.00015654,0.0009870421,0.000318634,0.003305803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793262,0.0002435703,0.01746545,0.000100378,0.000007593421,0.0001124586,0.0007869252,0.00005631369,0.001901075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001852969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005606413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008197071560374102,"score_gpt":0.234034990813478,"score_spread":0.2258379192531039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}