{"id":"W1988708665","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01073.pp.x","title":"Estimates of forest floor litter frog communities: A comparison of two methods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Austral Ecology","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Species richness; Rainforest; Plant litter; Ecology; Forest floor; Abundance (ecology); Litter; Biomass (ecology); Species diversity; Atlantic forest; Sampling (signal processing); Community structure; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Environmental science; Nutrient; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009188392,0.0008499998,0.0009403851,0.005157913,0.0003932729,0.000769835,0.001076788,0.0007066944,0.001526277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02497369,0.0006709993,0.0007198128,0.001515897,0.0004728094,0.001146271,0.001518101,0.0004479956,0.0005007175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005821902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003938199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002414201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006670129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874391,0.007044455,0.0007261021,0.001847989,0.002753975,0.0001884874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805275,0.01240422,0.002003746,0.001502496,0.003226739,0.0003354457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003705526,0.000426709,0.525694,0.001352157,0.002191075,0.0001667362,0.002115676,0.003616282,0.02477404,0.0008387623,0.0006445772,0.4344746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005797188,0.003278967,0.9005433,0.0002753967,0.0008614479,0.00176424,0.001282271,0.06939383,0.01535228,0.001827202,0.004497109,0.0003442339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7671759,0.003283696,0.2239791,0.0001049088,0.0001078611,0.0005885252,0.001221445,0.0005556179,0.002983009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7573996,0.001095145,0.2375946,0.00005951647,0.00006052519,0.0009017647,0.001157924,0.000137204,0.001593732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009188392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04859346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05005902702692706,"score_gpt":0.373774997407983,"score_spread":0.3237159703810559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}