{"id":"W1988708665","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01073.pp.x","title":"Estimates of forest floor litter frog communities: A comparison of two methods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Austral Ecology","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Species richness; Rainforest; Plant litter; Ecology; Forest floor; Abundance (ecology); Litter; Biomass (ecology); Species diversity; Atlantic forest; Sampling (signal processing); Community structure; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Environmental science; Nutrient; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002073764,0.0001010925,0.0003406847,0.00003210427,0.00004492889,0.0000021196,0.0002553941,0.0001274704,0.007381341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002868122,0.00008233627,0.00006407772,0.00009136672,0.00091272,0.00004373124,0.000171857,0.000125732,0.000111782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003384353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008542901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001582494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003752698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990986,0.0001602228,0.0003231471,0.0001170761,0.00005327803,0.0002476743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993174,0.0002509289,0.0001527466,0.0002208222,0.000008448631,0.00004964618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002782144,0.0001471088,0.9859741,0.000006698838,0.00002064277,0.000002622251,0.0005996154,0.001102746,0.007208633,0.0001331948,0.0007550485,0.004021726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005631783,0.000598445,0.9823348,0.000007915851,0.00003254786,0.00003259883,0.0008549599,0.00395961,0.006411091,0.001880119,0.003194146,0.0001306221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940724,0.00002001875,0.001228271,0.0001546891,0.000131785,0.0001064703,0.000004631044,0.00001400524,0.004267741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716275,0.000009714863,0.02780095,0.0001138357,0.00001597941,0.000007968008,0.00001130081,0.000006337321,0.0004064655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02657268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05005902702692706,"score_gpt":0.373774997407983,"score_spread":0.3237159703810559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}