{"id":"W1988708767","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608(2007)27[345:ffaofa]2.0.co;2","title":"Forest Fires and Old-Growth Forest Abundance in Wet, Cold, Engelmann Spruce – Subalpine Fir Forests of British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Areas Journal","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Abies lasiocarpa; Picea engelmannii; Forestry; Old-growth forest; Geography; Subalpine forest; Logging; Disturbance (geology); Range (aeronautics); Montane ecology; Abundance (ecology); Forest management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003149321,0.0002671444,0.000238147,0.001799896,0.001242754,0.001176769,0.0007453301,0.000278181,0.002744154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001246962,0.0002440545,0.0002182662,0.003108095,0.0004167984,0.0003591885,0.000416533,0.000428613,0.0003340878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01087397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006172934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997163,0.00001920196,0.00002948118,0.0000604738,0.00008138399,0.00009313501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998293,0.0001615627,0.0002929543,0.00005375282,0.0007568806,0.0004417907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006875898,0.00001955859,0.9925535,0.00004372312,0.00005157098,0.00009891675,0.0004207694,0.0001961658,0.0003460569,0.00004875379,0.001334451,0.004817704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001711259,0.000002387242,0.9989383,0.00001605234,0.00000789022,0.00002339927,0.0004593805,0.0000952312,0.00002767485,0.0000045683,0.0004205959,0.000002790895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896935,0.0008430523,0.00006849484,0.00008962279,0.00001003601,0.00001295935,0.006930313,0.00001475012,0.002337366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994841,0.000488474,0.0001243309,0.00003400506,0.00000370079,0.00001055499,0.002596052,0.000005880759,0.001895989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01087397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07889658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002472226730126769,"score_gpt":0.1791103096376522,"score_spread":0.1766380829075255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}